A California lawmaker introduced a bill Thursday that would require schools that play major college sports to pay some athletes as much as $25,000 annually, along with covering the cost of six-year guaranteed athletic scholarships and post-college medical expenses.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The College Athlete Protection Act is sponsored by Assemblymember Chris Holden, who is a former San Diego State basketball player, and is the type of state-level legislation that the NCAA is looking to federal lawmakers to preempt.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
California was the first state to pass a law that gave college athletes the right to be compensated for name, image and likeness back in 2019. That triggered similar action by state legislatures around the country.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The NCAA lifted its ban on athletes cashing in on their fame with sponsorship and endorsement deals, but more than two dozen state-level NIL laws have made it impossible for the association to create detailed and uniform rules of its own.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Just last week at the NCAA convention, college sports leaders reiterated the need for Congress’ help in regulating NIL compensation and protecting the association from state laws that undercut its ability to govern college sports.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
<\/react-trigger><\/p>\n \u201cWe need to solidify that as it relates to college sports, federal law preempts state law,\u201d Baylor President Linda Livingstone, the chairwoman of the NCAA’s Board of Governors, said last week. \u201cIn areas such as NIL, we already see that state legislators will take action that they believe will give the universities in their states a competitive edge over their neighbors.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The bill introduced by Holden, a Democrat whose district includes Pasadena, calls for Division I schools in California to share 50% of revenue with athletes who are considered to be undervalued because the amount of their athletic scholarships doesn’t match their market value. That would mostly be aimed at athletes competing in the revenue-generating sports such as football and basketball, but not exclusively.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Money paid toward scholarships would be included in the 50% that goes toward the players. The rest would go into a fund that would pay out yearly. Individual payments would be determined based on what schools bring in and could not exceed $25,000 per year for any one athlete.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Any excess revenue from the athletes’ share would go into a degree completion fund that athletes would be eligible to draw from after they have graduated within six years.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The bill also calls for schools to provide coverage of sports-related medical expenses, establish and enforce safety standards and transparency in recruiting, preserve all sports programs \u2014 not just those that produce revenue \u2014 and Title IX compliance.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The bill is reminiscent of one introduced in 2020 at the federal level by four Democratic senators, including Cory Booker of New Jersey, called the College Athlete Bill of Rights<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n That bill, similar to numerous others related to college sports and more specifically NIL, introduced in Congress went nowhere.<\/p>\n<\/div>\nPolitical Cartoons<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/www.usnews.com\/object\/image\/00000185-cbbe-d524-a5ed-effe7d9f0000\/mrz011923dapc.jpg?update-time=1674161026052&size=responsive640\")
<\/picture><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n