Now that the dust has cleared on the drama surrounding the selection of Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), the GOP-led House of Representatives is wasting no time in filing the 118th Congress\u2019 first cannabis bills.<\/p>\n
On Jan. 13, Rep. Alex Mooney (R-WV) filed the Second Amendment Protection Act<\/a>. The bill would seek to allow medical marijuana cardholders to legally purchase and possess firearms. Federal law currently prohibits them from doing so.<\/p>\n A few days later, on Jan. 18, Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) filed the Veterans Cannabis Use for Safe Healing Act<\/a>. That bill would codify existing policy that permits military veterans to discuss marijuana with VA doctors, and ensure that veterans do not lose government benefits if they become medical marijuana patients.<\/p>\n Both bills have been filed before, by the same sponsors. Mooney\u2019s bill only garnered two co-sponsors<\/a>, while Steube had introduced his bill twice before, with no success.<\/p>\n \u201cBoth of them represent an improvement from the status quo. but I think Congress has the political capacity for\u2014and the American public deserves\u2014more substantive reforms,\u201d Justin Strekal, a veteran cannabis advocate and lobbyist, who now runs the BOWL PAC<\/a>, told Leafly.<\/p>\n \u201cThe two bills are incredibly narrow pieces of legislation that in prior Congresses did not receive much support from other GOP lawmakers,\u201d he added. \u201cBoth of them are only focused on addressing medical state issues despite the fact that half of the American population now lives in adult use states.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Related<\/p>\n Why do medical cannabis and gun ownership rights conflict so often?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/a><\/p>\n Even though both bills failed to gain traction in previous terms, they may find more success in the new, GOP-run House of Representatives.<\/p>\n Don Murphy, a veteran cannabis lobbyist and four-time Republican Convention delegate who previously worked as a conservative liaison for the Marijuana Policy Project, sounded a note of optimism. <\/p>\n \u201cI think these bills will fare better because now the Republican Party is in the majority,\u201d he said. \u201cWhen you\u2019re in the majority, you\u2019re expected to deliver. The expectations are higher when you hold the gavel.\u201d <\/p>\n \u201cSome of these tangential bills, the ones around the edges, will get done, will get hearings and will get votes. Whether they\u2019ll pass in the Senate, I don\u2019t know,\u201d Murphy added.<\/p>\n Rep. Mooney\u2019s bill, if enacted, would begin to untangle the legal knot that prevents Americans from possessing firearms and marijuana.\u00a0<\/p>\n The complication stems from the federal Gun Control Act<\/a> of 1968, which prohibits an individual in possession of a controlled substance from possessing a firearm or ammunition.<\/p>\n Anyone seeking to purchase a firearm must fill out a form<\/a> that asks if they are an \u201cunlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance.\u201d Lying on that form can lead to felony charges.<\/p>\n \u201cI think we\u2019ve created millions of felons with this question. You can\u2019t imagine that everybody in Colorado, who under Colorado state law is legally using marijuana, has never purchased a firearm,\u201d Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), a co-sponsor of an earlier version of Mooney\u2019s bill, told Marijuana Moment<\/em> back in 2019<\/a>. \u201cThat would be completely illogical. Or vice versa.\u201d<\/p>\n Mooney\u2019s bill would only apply to medical patients, not adults who purchase cannabis in legal states. According to the Marijuana Policy Project<\/a>, nearly 5.5 million Americans had registered as medical marijuana patients as of May 2021.<\/p>\n As of this writing, Mooney\u2019s bill has picked up four co-sponsors, all Republicans: David Joyce (OH), Nancy Mace (NC), Massie and Brian Mast (FL). <\/p>\n Representative Steube\u2019s bill\u2014which he has introduced in different versions of in the past two Congresses\u2014seeks to codify existing policy that permits VA doctors to discuss marijuana with patients. It furthermore ensures that veterans do not lose benefits if they become medical marijuana patients.<\/p>\n It does not permit VA doctors to prescribe marijuana to their patients, however.<\/p>\n \u201cAs a veteran, I\u2019m committed to ensuring that veterans receive the care they deserve, and I know that sometimes that care can include medical marijuana,\u201d Steube said in a statement.<\/p>\n Murphy thinks the bill could find traction in the Veteran Affairs Committee. \u201cThere are a fair number of good Republicans on Veteran Affairs who voted for SAFE banking in the past. If you\u2019re voting for SAFE Banking, how do you not support veterans access? Veterans are the key for moving this forward for Republicans,\u201d he told Leafly.<\/p>\n The 118th Congress has only just begun, and many more bills could be introduced, or re-introduced, from the last Congress.<\/p>\n Last session, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-NC) emerged as a vocal proponent of cannabis reform and introduced the States Reform Act<\/a>, which would have decriminalized cannabis at the federal level. That bill, for one, could get revived. (According to Politico\u2019s Natalie Fertig<\/a>, Mace said recently that she aspires to be the \u201cgodmother\u201d of cannabis.)<\/p>\n \u201cYou have leaders like Rep. Mace and Rep. Dave Joyce [R-OH<\/a>] who both previously introduced bills to end marijuana prohibition by removing it from the CSA [Controlled Substances Act]. I have no doubt in my mind that both of them intend to do so again this Congress,\u201d Strekal told Leafly.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Related<\/p>\n Meet Congress\u2019 new Republican cannabis caucus<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/a><\/p>\n Rep. Mace also introduced a bill in the last days of the previous session to ease legal cannabis businesses\u2019 tax burden<\/a>; she could re-introduce it this session as well.<\/p>\nWill these bills fare better in a GOP-run House?<\/h2>\n
Second Amendment bill would solve a persistent issue, but only for MMJ patients<\/h2>\n
Veterans bill has narrow scope, but is valuable nonetheless<\/h2>\n
Are more cannabis bills on the way?<\/h2>\n